10/28/26 - Mark Levin: Democrats Are Playing Dirty to Seize Power

On Wednesday’s Mark Levin Show, the Democrat Party is trying to steal the Senate. A New York Times report says that allies of Mary Peltola orchestrated a “Ballot Composition Project” in Alaska aimed at recruiting spoiler candidates, including another candidate named Dan Sullivan, to create voter confusion and weaken support for incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan. Campaign aides, Democratic operatives, lawyers, and officials connected to Chuck Schumer’s Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee were involved in a coordinated effort to shape the ballot. The operation sought to recruit multiple candidates to dilute the incumbent’s vote and improve Peltola’s chances in a closely watched Senate race. The objective of this plot is simple: power at all costs.  Also, there are allegations surrounding Abdul El-Sayed’s family connections to Life for Relief and Development, a charity he says had members with Muslim Brotherhood ties and a history of federal investigations, FBI and U.S. military raids, sanctions violations, and a settlement with the Office of Foreign Assets Control over allegations of funneling money to Saddam Hussein’s regime. El-Sayed’s father, Dr. Mohammed El-Sayed, served on the organization’s board, while other family members were connected to related organizations that later faced scrutiny for alleged terrorist ties. Michigan needs to disregard the polling and vote.  Later, Bruce Blakeman calls in and makes his closing case for New York governor. NY is in a death spiral under Kathy Hochul - high taxes, rising utility costs, job losses, population decline, and poor economic performance. Blakeman warned that the state is running out of time to reverse its decline. A victory would protect rights, reduce taxes, improve public safety, and put NY on a path toward renewal. Afterward, Netanyahu, Likud, and the conservative parties have defeated Eisenkot and the opposition non-Arab parties. Netanyahu won. Eisenkot lost.  Why would President Herzog, as reported, choose the Eisenkot opposition to take the first shot a building a majority coalition when they lost to the Netanyahu coalition?  And, if the Netanyahu coalition cannot pull together a majority, and the Eisenkot opposition fails, why shouldn't there be another election?  Why should Netanyahu agree to a plan, also in the press, where Herzog offers Netanyahu a deal in which he is PM for 2-years plus he will pardon him on the legal charges (when, in fact, the charges have fallen to