Phang vs. Blanche - The Epstein Files Transparency Act Lawsuit Part Three

The Department of Justice claimed it had complied with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Katie Phang identified five alleged violations and asked a federal judge to intervene. In Part Three, I cover her motion for a preliminary injunction, DOJ's arguments for why she shouldn't be allowed to sue, Phang's response, and Judge Emmet Sullivan's decision to grant the injunction after DOJ failed to substantively address a single one of the five alleged violations.

For bonus content, ad-free and early episodes, archived episodes, a private Discord community, and more, subscribe to @fthatpod on Patreon or here

Don't forget to check out the website!

www.fthatpod.com

If you liked what you heard today, give the podcast a like, review, and subscribe.

Follow F**k That on TikTok@fthatpod

Instagram @fthat_pod

YouTube Channel: @fthatpod

Thank you to this week's sources:

Court Documents - Phang v. Blanche, No. 1:26-cv-01417

Phang's Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Injunction - May 28, 2026 (ECF 9-1)

DOJ's Memorandum in Opposition - June 5, 2026 (ECF 12)